As a quick follow-up to my brush with history with the Loving v. Commonwealth of VA case and on interracial and same-sex marriage equality, I thought I’d provide some links to what happened this week in the US Supreme Court.
You can hear the oral arguments as well as read the transcript of the hearings on the Supreme Court’s website.
- To hear or read the arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry (the Prop 8 case) from Tuesday, March 26, click here.
- To hear or read the arguments in United States v Windsor (the DOMA case) from Wednesday, March 27, click here.
And for some other commentary on the possible outcomes of these two cases, you might want to check out SCOTUS Blog.
The commentary I think is particularly good was written by Tom Goldstein. He gives a great summary of the tension between these two cases entitled “The Relationship between DOMA and Proposition 8.
Overturning DOMA argues that the federal government can’t deny benefits to individuals whenever a state has said that a same-sex couple has a civil right to marry (a 10th amendment states’ rights argument). In contrast, overturning Proposition 8 is an argument for equal protection and due process (an 14th amendment anti-discrimination argument) and would therefore—like Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia in 1967—trump states’ rights.
Based on this blog, I have two sets of questions.
- Will both amendments be upheld or will one trump the other? If one trumps the other, which one will “win out?” OR
- Will the Supreme Court just dodge this conflict by deciding not to decide? i.e., Will they declare that they can’t rule on this case because the proponents arguing to uphold Proposition didn’t have “standing” or the right to bring the case in the first place?
[…] across the country just like they did in Loving v. Virginia in 1967 (see my earlier blogs here and here on this issue) then we won’t need this interim step of civil unions and Metcalfe’s bill […]